EU blasts China for continued IP violations

Report finds 80% of counterfeit goods seized by EU customs officials made in China

  33094
Chinese flag (Pixabay photo)

Chinese flag (Pixabay photo)

TAIPEI (Taiwan News) — The European Commission believes China to be the worst offender in terms of intellectual property rights (IPR) infringement, according to the Financial Times on Thursday (June 18).

The information was based on a January EU report that ranked Beijing as a “priority 1” country due to the scale and persistence of IPR problems. The report found that China grants questionable patents and uses patent-thickets — dense groups of IP rights in certain fields — to hinder innovation.

Beijing’s frequent use of invalidation proceedings against patents by foreign companies allow Chinese firms to use patented foreign technologies “without paying adequate royalties,” the report says. The Financial Times commented that the "worst offenders continue to drain European businesses of jobs as well as billions of euros in revenues."

As for trademarks in China, the report found the main problem to be the registration of bad faith applications. While China’s trademark law has recently been strengthened, many loopholes remain.

Forced technology transfer (FTT) remains a systematic problem in China, the report states. With FTT, the government or private companies with government ties require, pressure, or induce European firms to transfer their technology to China in order to gain market access, investment access, or other government approvals.

While Chinese officials have stepped up efforts to cut down on counterfeiting, the report says the “measures in place do not seem to keep pace with new technologies and the sheer amount of infringements.” It found that 80 percent of counterfeit and pirated goods seized by EU customs officials originated from China and Hong Kong.

Although China’s legal system has made some progress in improving intellectual property rights protection, “Concerns still remain about the lack of clarity of legal provisions, which often seem to provide the authorities with an unusually broad margin of discretion for the practical implementation of laws and regulations,” the report states.