Hong Kong's police watchdog on Friday said allegations of police brutality should not be instrumentalized as a "weapon of political protest," warning the consequences could result in the further deterioration of public security.
"The protests have been driven and continue to be driven by a consistent and continuing message of hatred against the police," said the Independent Police Complaints Council (IPCC) report. "The message suggests that the police had used 'excessive force' in dealing with protesters, amounting to 'police brutality.'"
Anti-government protesters had accused the police of heavy-handed attempts to disperse protesters, saying riot police consistently used tear gas, water cannon and even batons to quell demonstrations.
But the IPCC report noted that police officers who "exceed or may have exceeded the limits of the powers conferred on him by law" were "accountable under the law."
"That is a legal and not a political matter," it added.
Read more: Hong Kong activist Martin Lee: 'I know justice is on my side'
'Rebuild public trust'
Last year, large demonstrations emerged in opposition to proposed legislation to allow extradition to mainland China. However, the protests evolved into a pro-democracy movement calling for expanded democratic rights, further autonomy from Beijing and greater police accountability.
The protests were dubbed the most violent in decades.
The IPCC report called on the Hong Kong police force to confront the challenges presented by the anti-government movement, saying failure to do so could herald an "era of terrorism."
"The police force must formulate new strategic directions and equip itself with physical and technological resources, adequate and ready to confront the challenge of multiple city-wide guerilla-type attacks aided by advance technology and accompanied by violence and vandalism verging on terrorism," the IPCC said.
"It will be important for the police force to restore and rebuild public trust."
Legitimacy in question
Last December, an international panel of experts quit the IPCC investigation, saying the watchdog lacked sufficient authority to conduct a thorough probe.
"We ultimately concluded that a crucial shortfall was evident in the power, capacity and independent investigative capability of IPCC," the experts said in a statement at the time.
The IPCC pushed back, with Chairman Anthony Neoh saying the experts "do not understand Hong Kong's situation." The experts comprised former or serving leaders of law enforcement watchdogs in the UK, Australia and New Zealand, among others.
ls/rt (Reuters, AFP)
Every evening, DW's editors send out a selection of the day's hard news and quality feature journalism. You can sign up to receive it directly here.